Effective
Teaching Strategies
- Interdisciplinary/Thematic Units
- Utilizing all levels of questioning
from Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive level of
understanding
- Cooperative learning
- Whole language
- Language Experience
- Student Centered Learning
- Incorporate opportunists for students
to self-assess their understanding
- Inquiry Based Learning
- Universal Design for Learning
- Differentiated Instruction / lessons
- Different Leveled Readings
- Use of Technology
- Frequent Assessments/Progress Monitoring
- Problem-Based Discussions
- Mobilization
- Pictures & Visuals
- Graphic Organizers
- Use of Color
- Metacognitive Strategies
Points to Consider When
Creating Lessons
- Age appropriate rigor
- Academic Standards
- Level of langue proficiency
- Students background knowledge
- Ways to activate critical thinking
- Ways to promote Culturally Responsive
Standards-Based (CRSB) teaching
- Ways to promote transfer previously learned skills and knowledge to learn new linguistic and academic skills and content
Culturally Responsive, Standard-Based (CRSB) Teaching
A teaching strategy where teachers bring
their students: experiences, understanding, views, concepts, language, and
culture into their lessons.
Promoting Culturally Responsive Standards-Based Teaching
Though short, the article, Promoting
Culturally Responsive Standards-Based Teaching by Barton and Saifer
(2007) was informative and to the point as it discussed the “six essential
elements that are embedded” (p.25) in a Culturally Responsive Standard-Based
(CRSB) classroom. To summarize, one can strengthen their teaching and the
learning of second language learners by first creating student centered lessons
that activate critical thinking skills and allowing the teacher to act as a
facilitator of the learning environment. One should incorporate students in the
lesson planning. By allowing the students to select what and how they learn
creates student buy in and increases student motivation. Keeping the students
apart of creating lessons and objectives will also allow them to self-assess
their understanding. Lessons should start by activating students’ prior
knowledge and encouraging the use of outside resources (family, internet,
community, etc.). Students can then inquire new content by contenting new
information to their prior knowledge. Lessons should encourage students
to continue to access their outside resources and build a positive learning
team with their peers, teachers, and community. Lastly, one should incorporate
alternative authentic assessments that allow both the students and teacher to
reflect on both academic progress and adjustments that need to be made (Barton
& Saifer 2007).
Why Use Thematic Units,
Interdisciplinary Lessons & Sheltered Instruction?
Dr. Krashen and Dr. Collier (ACE, 2014)
research states that thematic units, interdisciplinary lesson plans, and
sheltered instruction are effective instructional strategies for English
language learners (ELLs) and appropriately accommodate the stages of the
Natural Approach for language acquisition (ACE, 2014). Sheltered instruction
allows for students to learn grade level content in addition to acquiring
English skills (Fritzen, 2011). The thematic units and interdisciplinary
lessons provided the structure and focus for sheltered instruction. Thematic,
interdisciplinary instruction allows for ELL students to simultaneous work on
multiple areas of grade level content which enhances the students’ ability to
generalize their skills across the board. Thematic, interdisciplinary
instruction also provides the needed repetition of knowledge and vocabulary
that ELLs need to acquire a second language.
Example
of Interdisciplinary/Thematic Unit
Objective/Outcomes: Content Area 1
(Science)
|
Objective/Outcomes: Content Area 2
(Literacy)
|
11. A.4c Collect, organize and analyze data
accurately and precisely. (Illinois Science Learning Standards).
-Identify different simple machines, how
they work, where/when they are used, and why they are used.
|
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text (Common Core State Standards, 2014). |
Grade Level of Students Served:
10th grade- intermediate
|
Grade Level of Students Served:
10th grade- intermediate
|
Unit Theme:
Making life easier.
|
Brainstorm Associations
for Interdisciplinary/Thematic Unit:
Content Area 1:
Physical Science
|
Theme:
Making life easier.
|
Content Area 2:
English/Literacy
|
Ideas:
· Research a simple machine
and describe how it works and why it makes life easier.
· Preform a task with or
without a simple machine. What data can be collected to determine if the
simple machine is effective or not?
· Describe how the vocabulary
word “work” related to simple machines
· List different simple
machines that are used in everyday life.
· Create a simple machine
|
Ideas:
· Using the computer find
different articles about different simple machines.
· Research how different
simple machines help make tasks easier
· Highlight different evidence
from the text explain how a particular simple machine works
· Give examples of different
simple machines and where/when they are used.
· Interview a friend about a
task he/she hates to do any why. Create a poster on your friend’s least
favorite task and present it to the class.
· Research a simple machine
that will help make your friend’s hated task easier.
|
Guiding Questions
for Interdisciplinary/Thematic Unit:
Guiding Questions
|
1. Using evidence from different sources,
explains why and when a particular simple machine was created. (Where did the
idea for a particular machine come from?)
|
2. Using evidence from difference sources
what some common simple machines and how they work?
|
3. Where/When are simple machines used in
everyday life?
|
4. How can one prove simple machines
require us to use less “work” and “power?”
|
Example of Activities Reflecting
Bloom's Taxonomy Levels of Understanding:
Module 1
|
|||||
Remembering / Knowledge
|
Understanding / Comprehension
|
Applying/ Application
|
Analyzing / Analysis
|
Evaluating / Evaluation
|
Creating/ Synthesis
|
Draw a picture of six simple machines.
|
Identify what kind of simple machine is
being used in the picture.
|
Write a paragraph about a simple machine
and how it is used in everyday life (make sure to site evidence from
different sources).
|
Given multiple scenarios, compare and
contrast which simple machine would be best to use and why.
|
Using supporting evidence defend why a
particular simple machine is more effective than the other simple
machines.
|
Design an experiment proving how different
simple machines make life easier.
|
Define what a simple machine is.
|
Create a poster of a simple machine and
where it is use in everyday life.
|
Module 2
|
|||||
Remembering / Knowledge
|
Understanding / Comprehension
|
Applying/ Application
|
Analyzing / Analysis
|
Evaluating / Evaluation
|
Creating/ Synthesis
|
Write the equation for “work” and “power”
|
Describe the difference between “work” and
“power” and how they relate to simple machines.
|
Solve for the amount of “work” and “power”
used based on the information give.
|
Experiment with different simple machines
and determine which is most effective for a given task.
|
Design a simple machine based on research
from different sources. Then use the simple machine to perform a selected
task.
|
Cooperative Learning
A teaching strategy where students work
together to complete a task.
Example of Cooperative Learning Activity:
Students will work in groups of two to three
to research and design a simple machine to perform a predetermined task. The
students will decided which simple machine they would like to build and what
task it is they would like to accomplish using their simple machine. Each
student in the group will find at least one article (from any source) on how to
create their selected simple machine. The group will then decide what materials
they will need. The students will designate different group members to bring in
particular materials. Using the different research articles, together the group
will build their simple machine. The group will then test their simple machine
on their predetermined task. Each student will then write their own reflection
paragraph/s about: what each group members’ role was, what parts of their
project was successful, what part of their project was unsuccessful, and what
they would do differently next time. The group will receive a group grade for
the simple machine built, but will receive individual grades for their
reflective paragraph/s.
Whole Language
A way to teach langue and literacy skills by
learning whole words and phrases through meaningful and natural activities and
interactions with others (not through phonics exercises).
Example of Whole Language Activity:
Students will be grouped in pairs and given
multiple scenarios (in picture form or written form). The students will
tradeoff reading/or describing the scenario to their partner. The pair will
then discuss which simple machine would be most beneficial in that particular
scenario and why. The students will then each write a sentence or two
summarizing why they picked that particular simple machine for that scenario.
Both their summaries will be submitted to the teacher.
Language Experience
A reading instruction strategy where the
teacher and or student/s create a written story or activity about the students
personal experience/s to help the student/s learn the written form of a word
with the spoken form.
Example of Learning Experience Activity:
After a lesson of different kinds of simple
machines, students will work in pairs and select one of the simple machines.
Together the pair will create a poster describing where and how the simple
machine they choose is used outside in the “real world.” The pair will then
present their poster to the class.
Differentiated
Instruction
Differentiated instruction is where a teacher
creates different leveled activities for students at varying levels. This
allows students to do different things, but still meet the same state or
district standards (Martin & Pickett 2013).
Universal Design for
Learning (UDL)
Universal Design for Learning is a set of guidelines
that when followed, guarantees all students can access the content and
objectives (CAST 2011).
Guidelines:
http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/updateguidelines2_0.pdf
Why Use Differentiated
Instruction and Universal Design?
Many teachers utilize differentiated
instruction and Universal Design in all their classes to reach the diverse
needs of all their students. Differentiated and Universal instruction Design
are especially used in the special education classes and lower level general
education classes. By utilizing differentiation, teachers are able to start at
the level each student is at and then increase the student’s skills from there.
Students who are behind are able to work on remedial skills while students
above standards are able to work on higher level assignments. Differentiated
instruction helps eliminates students feeling board, overwhelmed, inadequate,
and frustrated. Universal Design allows for students to learn similar
objectives because the information and assignments are presented in a way that
allows all students access the content no matter what their physical or
cognitive level. As a result of differentiation and Universal Design, student
are increasing both their knowledge and skills. Differentiation and Universal
Design have also allowed many of the students in special education the chance
to learn in the general education setting (Kunic, 2012).
Example of a Lesson Utilizing Universal
Design for Learning
**Note: This lesson is aligned with three of
the Common Core science standards and meets the needs of my diverse learners
through research-based teaching strategies (such as UDL).
Lesson Plan
Lesson Title:
Pulley IMA Lab
|
Content Area:
Physical Science
|
Grade Level:
10th Grade
|
Overview of Lesson:
Students will find the ideal mechanical
advantage of different pulley systems by creating different pulley
configurations.
|
||
Learning Objectives:
- 11.B.4b Propose and compare
different solution designs to the design problem based upon given constraints
including available tools, materials and time.
- 11.B.4c Develop working
visualizations of the proposed solution designs (e.g., blueprints,
schematics, flowcharts, cad
11.B.4e Develop and test a prototype or
simulation of the solution design using available materials, instruments and
technology.
|
||
Target Student Group: Students with an
IEP in a co-taught general education setting.
|
||
Key Content Concepts: -Simple Machines -Ideal Mechanical Advantage (IMA of a pulley system is equal to the number of pulley’s used) -Fixed Pulley -Movable Pulley -Block and Tackle System |
||
Rational for Instructional Remediation
Strategy and Universal Design Principles:
-Directions and information are presented
auditorily and visually thorough words and pictures to aid in understanding.
-Students are allowed to utilize their
textbook and group members to aid in understanding vocabulary.
-Students use materials such as pulley’s
and string to make models of the different types of pulley systems. This
allows students to demonstrate their skills in an alternative way. This also
allows students to use their inquire skills and figure out how to build a
pulley system on their own.
-This is an inquire lab which allows this
lesson to be very student centered and enhances the use of critical thinking
and problem solving skills.
-Students work in small groups increasing
their science skills, collaboration, and sense of community.
-Through building different models of
pulley’s and utilizing resources (textbook & peers), students realize
the number of strings barring the weight of the load in a
pulley’s system is equal to the ideal mechanical advantage.
-After creating multiple pulley systems and
finding the IMA, students are then asked to draw a conclusion and make a
generalized statement about the relationship between the number of pulleys
and the IMA.
-Using manipulative allow students to learn
through physical means.
-After creating the pulley systems using
the manipulatives, the students are then asked to draw a picture of their
model. This allows students to document their work and gives them a visual to
refer back to when they later reflect and draw conclusions. This also allows
a teacher to assess a student’s skills if they are not around when the
student builds their model.
-Students are asked explain why and what
pulley systems are used in everyday life. This allows students to add meaning
and purpose to participating in the lab.
|
||
Materials/Technology Required for Lesson:
-Ring Stand
-Pulleys
-String
-Spring scale
-Weight
-Meter stick
|
||
Instructional Steps for Conducting the
Lesson:
Note: Going into the lab the students will
already be familiar with the different types of pulleys and associated
vocabulary.
1. As
a bell ringer, students will be asked to brainstorm different examples of
pulleys in everyday life. Students will then share their ideas with the
class.
2. As
a class, the purpose statement of the lab will be read aloud. The purpose
states: “You are to explore the ideal mechanical advantage provided by
different pulley systems. You will be creating different pulley
configurations to help you understand the concept of ideal mechanical
advantage (IMA) (For help see page 141-12 in your textbook).”
3. Students
will break into groups of two. Using the provided materials, they will build
a fixed pulley.
4.Students
will draw a picture of their model and label and indicate the direction of
the: input force, fulcrum, and output force.
5. Using
the textbooks and notes previously given in class, students will identify the
IMA of a fixed pulley and supporting evidence.
6. Students
will repeat steps 3-5 for a: single movable pulley, block and
tackle with two pulleys, and a block and tackle with four pulleys.
7. As
a conclusion, Students will discuss and write down a generalized statement
about the relationship between the number of pulleys and the IMA. Students
will then again discuss and write why and what pulley systems are used in
everyday life.
|
Assessment Rubric
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Participation
|
Student used their time effectively and
student stayed on task the whole time.
|
Student used their time effectively a
majority of the time and the student stayed on task for most of the time.
|
Student inconsistently used their time
effectively and was frequently found off task.
|
Student did not use their time effectively
and was off task for the majority of the time.
|
Accurate IMA Identified
|
IMA for all 4 designed pulley systems were
correct.
|
IMA for 3 of the designed pulley systems
were correct.
|
IMA for 2 of the designed pulley systems
were correct.
|
IMA for 1 of the designed pulley systems
were correct.
|
Drawings
|
All diagrams were neatly and accurately
drawn and labeled.
|
Most of the diagrams were drawn and labeled
neatly and accurately with a few errors.
|
Diagrams were drawn neatly and accurately,
but were often intricately labeled.
|
Diagrams were not neatly drawn and labels
were inaccurate.
|
Conclusion
|
Student drew an accurate conclusion about
how to identify the IMA of a pulley system and provided multiple everyday
examples of pulley systems.
|
Student drew an accurate conclusion about
how to identify the IMA of a pulley system and provided a few everyday
examples of pulleys.
|
Student drew an accurate conclusion about
how to identify the IMA of a pulley system, but did not provide
any everyday examples.
|
Student did not draw an accurate conclusion
about how to identify the IMA of a pulley system nor did they provide any
everyday examples.
|
Why Use Different Colors?
Some teachers use different colors to prompt
her students to communicate in either Spanish or English. Researchers such as
Thelen and Klifman (2001) express the importance of using a variety of visual
cues such as color to smoothly transition from one activity to the next. With
the help of visual cues students are able to learn and differentiate teacher
expectations and transition independently. By always keeping Spanish in one
color and English in another, the students knew the expectation to think and
speak in that particular language without any verbal prompts from the teacher.
This strategy can also help the students organize their thoughts and better
store information in their long-term memory (Sandra and Wetzels, 2009).
A study done by Lamberski (1982), shows color
coding materials, increases students attention and associative memory. The
student’s taught in color remembered more information than the students taught
in black and white. As an educator I can use the simple strategy of color
association and visual cues to universally express my expectations and expedite
students’ transfer of skills and content.
Metacognative Strategies
See the list of learning strategies for ELL
students at: http://www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/download/shiningstar/Chamot.pdf
One needs to make sure lessons are
universally designed using: multiple means of representation, repetition, and a
verity of checks for understanding. One also need to teach students to utilize
metcognitive strategies and skills such as: using graphic organizers,
summarizing, predicting, taking notes, accessing prior knowledge, visualizing,
cooperating with others, self-evaluating, accessing alternative resources, and
checking for compression (Chamot). These skills will help students be
successful even in an imperfect academic setting.
Example Lesson Using Metacongitive Strategies
In an intro mini-lesson on simple machines,
students start by writing down everything they know about simple machines and
the pictures on the board in their native language, English, or pictures. The
students then share their independent thoughts with their neighbor. While
sharing ideas with their partner they are communicating their prior knowledge
and increasing their vocabulary in a low risk setting. The students then discuss
their prior knowledge together as a class. The students are then asked to work
with their partner to come up with why simple machines are used and where they
can be seen in everyday life (see Appendix for simple machine lesson plans).
In this lesson the four metacognitive
strategies utilized to help students understand, remember, and learn new
information about simple machines are: using prior knowledge and experiences,
cooperation, prediction, and self-evaluation (Chamot). When the teacher places
the word “simple machines” on the board along with pictures of different
machines the teacher will explain how the students are independently going to
use their prior knowledge (or what they already know) about simple machines and
the pictures on the board to create a list of related information. The teacher
will explain to the students it is important to brainstorm what they already
know about a topic because it will make remembering new information easier when
they can connect it back to knowledge they already have. After the students
have a chance to independently brainstorm their ideas, they will be asked to
work with their partner and share their knowledge. Before the students get
started the teacher will discuss with the students the importance of cooperating
and working with others. In this discussion the teacher will acknowledge how
when people work together the more brain power they have to solve a problem. It
will also be stated when a person has to explain their ideas and teach someone
else their understanding increases and they will be more likely to remember the
new information. The feedback they receive from their partner will also help
expand their knowledge and understanding of simple machines. The teacher will
then model with one of the students how to respectfully share ideas and give
positive constructive feedback. The students will then discuss as a class what
information they already know about simple machines.
Using the information the class came up with
about simple machines; the students will be asked to work together and use
their prediction skills to predict why simple machines are used and some
examples of how they are used in everyday life. By the students making personal
predictions it helps them set a purpose and increase their personal curiosity
for new information about simple machines in future lessons. Lastly the
students will self-evaluate by referring back to their original independent
brainstorm about simple machines and writing down at least three things they
learned from their peers. The students will also pick one of the six simple
machines that is most interesting to them and wish to do further research on in
the future. The use of these four metacognitive strategies will increase
understanding, increase retention rate, increase the students’ knowledge of
simple machines (Chamot).
Appendix
Lesson plans for
mini-lesson on simple machines.
Grade Level: 10th Grade
|
Content Area: Physical Science
|
Lesson Plan Theme: Simple Machines
|
Description of Lesson:
|
||
Transfer-of-Skills Strategy
|
Description of Strategy
|
Implementation Steps
|
Strategy #1
Mobilization and Pictures (Sandra and
Wetzels, 2009)
|
Writing down or drawing pictures of all the
things one knows related to a particular topic or a picture.
|
|
Strategy #2
Problem-based Discussion (Sandra and Wetzels,
2009)
|
Hypothesizing possible explanations with
classmates.
|
|
Example Thematic Unit,
Interdisciplinary Lessons, & Sheltered Instruction
Dr. Krashen and Dr. Collier (ACE, 2014)
research states that thematic units, interdisciplinary lesson plans, and
sheltered instruction are effective instructional strategies for English
language learners (ELLs) and appropriately accommodate the stages of the
Natural Approach for language acquisition (ACE, 2014). Sheltered instruction
allows for grade level content in addition to acquiring English skills
(Fritzen, 2011). Effective sheltered instruction contain the following
components: building of background knowledge, comprehensible input, use of
cooperative learning, opportunities for interaction, repetition, engaging
learning activities, and opportunities for review (ACE, 2014). The following
one-week lesson plan for tenth graders reflects the different elements of
sheltered instruction through a thematic interdisciplinary unit on the
different states of matter.
One-Week Lesson Plan
|
The above one-week lesson plan for tenth graders reflects the different elements of sheltered instruction through a thematic interdisciplinary unit on the different states of matter. The week starts with students activating their prior knowledge as students think about how potholes are formed. Students then use their prior knowledge and cooperative learning groups (Hansen-Thomas, 2008)to conduct a discovery lab on the different characteristics of a solid, liquid, and gas. On day two, the students utilize graphic organizers and hands on activities to draw conclusions about different states of matter and Boyles’ and Charles’ law. On day three and four, students participate in an inquire lab (Settlage, Madsen, & Rustad, 2005) where they design and perform an experiment of their choosing that demonstrates either Charles’s or Boyle’s law. On the final day, the students present their experiments and conclusions to the class and the teacher grades the projects and student mastery of objectives using a rubric (Maxwell & National Centre for Vocational Education, 2010). Each day bell ringer and exit slip are utilized: to add repetition/review, assess student progress, stimulate prior knowledge, and foster complex thinking. The use: of visuals, pictures, videos, technology, texts in multiple languages, partner/group work, modeling, hands on activities, and graphic organizers are all in places to enhance understanding through multiple means of representation and differentiation (Hansen-Thomas, 2008). The use of sheltered instruction and thematic interdisciplinary units are essential to ensure the acquisition of grade level content and English language skills (Hansen-Thomas, 2008).
Strategies to Develop ELL's
Literacy Skills in Upper Elementary/Secondary Grade Levels
ELL students in the upper elementary and
secondary grades are faced with a challenging task when it comes to developing
literacy skills. The reason being they have to play “catch-up” to their English
speaking peers in both literacy skills and content (Howard, 2012). Depending on
a student’s developmental literacy stage: emergent, early, or
transitional/fluent (ACE, 2014) will determine the intensity of scaffolding and
support needed. Helman and Burns (2008), found a strong relationship between
oral proficiency and sight word acquisition. With this being said, for students
especially in the emergent stage of literacy development it is important to
instruct using activities that promote authentic collaborative oral
communication in low risk settings (partners, small groups, one-on-one with the
teacher) for students to practice and increase their oral fluency and
comprehension. Helman and Burns (2008) also share some effective teaching
strategies and activities to increase literacy skills for older ELL students
such as: interactive word walls, multiple opportunities to read high frequency
words, students creating sentences with new vocabulary, pictures and visuals to
go along with new vocabulary and content, word or picture sorts, repeated
readings, teaching and implementing self-monitoring strategies etcetera. The
drill and practice methods of teaching literacy skills are said to be
ineffective (Schulz, 2009), because ELL students are in “catch-up” mode it is
important to present information in an authentic meaningful way with a clear
connection to students prior-knowledge and lives outside of school. Utilizing
students’ prior knowledge and connecting to students lives increases both
motivation and retention of new content (Howard, 2012). Lessons need to
incorporate sheltered and targeted instruction where students develop both
age-appropriate language and content skills (Watkins & Lindahl, 2010).
Pairing the right book with the right student
also plays a huge role in increasing literacy development. Students in
different stages of reading development require different characteristics in
reading materials. Students in the Emergent stage benefit and have the most
success comprehending: simple narratives eight to sixteen pages long, with
simple text (high-frequency words with common beginning and ending letters) in
the first person present tense (one to two sentences per page) with lots of
visuals and repetition (ACE, 2014). Students in the Early stage benefit from:
long narrative or informational text (16-24 pages long) containing dialogue and
repetition, with high-frequency words with common phonemes (ch, sh, ing) and
rimes along with pictures that match the text (ACE, 2014). Finally the
Transitional/Fluent stage readers benefit from: text from a verity of genres
(short chapter books with 20 lines per page) containing longer sentences of new
content and minimal pictures (ACE, 2014). In addition to matching the structure
and complexity of a text to its reader it is equally to provide students with
adequate background knowledge and select text that relate to a students life
and/or personal interests (Howard, 2012).
Example of Interventions
& Ways to Assess Effectiveness
Instructional Issue/
Concern
|
Intervention Description
|
How Will You Assess
Intervention Success?
|
1. Reading Comprehension
|
Model meta cognitive reading strategies
through think alouds for: before, during, and after reading. Model and teach
students how to preview a text and make predictions before reading. Model and
teach students to annotate their text and check for understanding as they
read by asking themselves questions. Model and teach students how to
summarize important details and main ideas from the text. After modeling
these skills the teacher will gradually release the responsibility to the
students (Francis, Rivera, Lesauz, Kieffer, Rivera, Center, & University
of Huston, 2006). P24
|
After modeling and practicing the meta
cognitive reading strategies together as a class, have the students complete
the steps with a partner. Then have the students independently practice the
strategies. After the students have practiced as a class, in partners, and on
their own, have the students take a comprehension tests similar to the
state-mandated assessment (such as the PSAE and ACT).
|
2.Mathematical Vocabulary and Word Problems
|
ELLs need explicit instruction and practice
with mathematical vocabulary. ELLs should be provided with structured
activities that promote discussion between them and native English speaking
peers. The discussions and cooperative learning between the ELLs and native
English speaking peers with provide authentic of mathematical vocabulary
practice (Francis, Rivera, Lesauz, Kieffer, Rivera, Center, & University
of Huston, 2006).
Word sort: Pairs of students will be given
a stack of different operational mathematical terms. Together they will have
to sort the words/phrases into the correct category (addition, subtraction,
multiplication, or division). The students will then be given word problems
to solve that contain one of the words they just sorted.
|
Before the students start the activity they
will be given a pre-test of different word problems asking them to preform
different operations. Then after the students participate in the activity
they will be given a post-test with similar vocabulary as the pre-test.
|
3.Comprehension and Understanding of
inquiry skills, scientific content, and science related vocabulary
|
Written bell ringers related to applying
the concepts of the scientific method and experimental design. As part of the
bell ringer the teacher will explicitly teach and provide feedback on skills
such as: creating hypotheses, methods of collecting data, controlling
variables, supporting or disproving a hypothesis with evidence, and making
modifications for more accurate results. Have students participate in written
think-pair-shares in responses to the bell ringers. In addition, have the
students participate in inquiry based labs where they apply the steps of the
scientific method and experimental design. As part of the lab, they will
document their work and findings in a written lab report. The students will
work in small groups for the lab, but will individual be responsible for
their own lab write up (Buxton,
Allexsaht-Snider, Suriel, Kayumova, Choi, Bouton, & Baker, 2013).
|
A rubric will be used to assess students’
inquiry skills, use of scientific vocabulary, and science content (Buxton et al., 2013) after completion of a
lab report. See sample rubric at: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=ShowRubric&rubric_id=2464226&
|
Supporting ELL Students
& Increasing Science & Literacy Skills
Lee and Buxton (2013) discuss three practices
essential for effective science instruction for ELLs. The first being teachers
must have a solid understanding of the content they are teaching. Second,
teachers must have the knowledge and ability to prompt students’ scientific
understanding. And finally, teachers need to know how to promote scientific
inquiry. Through inquiry based lessons students learn how to: plan
investigations, collect data, construct explanations using supporting evidence,
and communicate their conclusions. In addition to the use of inquiry Lee and
Buxton (2013), explain additional knowledge and practices teachers need to
master in order to support their ELLs such as: content area literacy
strategies, langue support strategies, discourse strategies, home language
support, and home culture connections. In the table below examples of how Lee
and Buxton (2013) suggest implementing these knowledge and practices are
provided.
Five Domains of Effective
Ways to Support ELLs in the classroom (Lee & Buxton, 2013).
|
Knowledge and Practices
to be Implemented in the Classroom (Lee & Buxton, 2013)
|
Content Area Literacy Strategies
|
-Activate prior knowledge.
-practice comprehending expository
scientific text
-instruction on academic language and its
functions
-practice with different genres of
scientific writing
-utilizing graphic organizers
-practice reading science related books
selected by both the teacher and the student.
|
Language Support Strategies
|
-incorporating hands on-activities
-inclusion of real objects and events
-multiple means of representation
(gestural, oral, pictorial, graphic, and textual)
-provided examples of language being used
in multiple contexts
|
Discourse Strategies
|
-differentiating the level and mode of
communication
-Being aware of the different levels of
language proficiency
-Assess which students can and cannot
understand content presented through whole-class instruction and what
supports are needed
|
Home Language Support
|
-Use home language to help increase meaning
and understanding
-present vocabulary in both English and
native language
-allow code-switching
-encourage bilingual students to help less
proficient students by using the native language.
|
Home Culture Connections
|
-Connect what students know to science
topics being learned.
-Use cultural artifacts (ex. Measurement
tools)
-Use community resources
|
Researchers Van Garderen, Hanuscin, Lee, and
Kohn (2012), discuss the effectiveness of collaborative professional
development between special education teachers and general education teachers
as they implement: inquiry-based instruction, formative assessments, and
Universal Design for Learning to meet the needs of their diverse learners.
Through continual collaboration between general education teachers and special
education teachers, they can combine their expertise of content and
learning/behavior strategies to meet all their students’ needs. As part of a
professional development program Van Garderen, Hanuscin, Lee, and Kohn (2012),
educated the teachers first about the appropriate pedagogical techniques
available to support their implementation of inquiry-based instruction,
formative assessments, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). As part of this
professional development the 5E Learning Cycle Model (engage, explore, explain,
elaborate, and evaluate) was utilized and discussed as an effective planning
method. The use of the 5E Learning Cycle results “in greater achievement in
science, better retention of concepts, improved attitudes toward science and
science learning, improved reasoning ability, and superior process skills than
would be the case with traditional instructional approaches” (Van Garderen,
Hanuscin, Lee, & Kohn, 2012, p. 434). As part of the planning process both
the special education teacher and general education teacher would demonstrate
their knowledge of UDL by identifying possible learning barriers for students
with disabilities and students lacking English proficiency. Then together both
teachers would come up with solutions to the learning barriers. Through Van
Garderen, Hanuscin, Lee, and Kohn (2012) research, it is evident how
collaboration and professional development have increased the participating
teachers’ abilities to meet the needs of their diverse students.
Finally in addition to presenting culturally
relevant pedagogy through, inquiry, and Universal Design for Learning, it best
practice, when assessing diverse learners to use formative assessments.
Researchers Allison and Rehm (2007), express the importance of alternative
assessments “because they enable students to demonstrate their understanding of
information in multiple ways while providing them with a verity of
opportunities for success”(p.16). Often traditional assessments such as
multiple choice tests discriminate against culturally diverse students.
Formative assessments allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and
understanding without having to be proficient in English. A few examples of
formative assessments are: projects, multimedia formats, videos, graphic
organizers, observations, portfolios, exhibitions, demonstrations, journals,
self-assessments, and discussions (Allison and Rehm, 2007). Formative
assessment allow for a more accurate picture of what a student knows and their
thought process. With accurate data of student knowledge and understanding teachers
can make informed instructional decisions. Such as what content needs more or
less instruction or what kids of special supports a particular student needs to
be successful.
*Note: See full citations/references on the
"Reference" page. s
Nice summary..thank you.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very useful share! Work/Life English is dedicated to improving the lives of adult education ESL educators and their students. We offer a comprehensive range of ESL teaching materials to help educators successfully engage their students, leading to a host of positive effects on their professional and personal lives.
ReplyDelete